Therefore, the authors propose that factors such as low dissatisfaction, low commitment, low motivation, and low involvement are associated with low subjective success. You can read more about it
* Empirical evidence tends to show that a higher reputation (prestigious university, or higher education) is an asset that helps to acquire more resources in the future. In this line, they suggest that elements such as a low educational level, a weak university reputation, a lack of international experience and few job changes are associated with low subjective career success.
* Social capital and the quality of relationships. The quality of the relationship with other people is always crucial, even more so with supervisors, as they’re the ones who control and distribute the allocation of resources and positions. In this block it is assumed that elements such as low supervisor support, not having a mentor, having a small network and low reputation in the organisation are associated with low subjective success.
* Structure and other organisational features. The organisation itself and its structure are basic. In this line, factors such as high job insecurity, unfairness in processes and promotions, lack of opportunity for promotion or low utilisation of employees’ skills are perceived to be associated with low subjective success.
Four keys to fostering subjective success in organisations
The results of Ng and Feldman’s study are really interesting. They confirm that one’s own personality, low emotional stability and internal motivation, a lack of strong social capital, and a weak organisational structure can partly explain a person’s subjective success. Background or starting conditions as well as reputation don’t seem to have a strong relationship to this type of success.
Because the subjective success of career paths is key for individuals themselves, has a positive impact on people’s attitudes towards organisations and has important organisational implications, as we’ve observed, it would be interesting to:
* Measure the subjective success of employees, as far as possible, using scales that are continually being developed.
* Monitor this subjective success over time and understand its evolution.
* Pay more attention to employees with low subjective success. Organisations tend to pay more attention and resources to “top talent” or “rising stars”. It’s essential not to leave less successful employees behind, objectively and subjectively speaking, as this can generate counterproductive cycles in the organisation.
* Understand, and “discover” what employees want from their career paths. We can often have a distorted picture of what each employee wants to achieve in their career. In this sense, it would be necessary to conduct qualitative studies that can go beyond what we intuit.
Developing personal careers is a major focus of people management in organisations. Up to now, a lot of emphasis has been placed on the objective success of some employees. However, it is necessary to focus on the subjective career success of all employees.