Comparing ourselves to others in the office, in our family and even in our leisure time has become a ubiquitous phenomenon, especially since social media has become part of our daily lives. No longer do we compare ourselves only with those close to us, but we now have access to the lives and experiences of people all over the world at the swipe of a finger. What impact does this have on our perception of work-life balance?

In this article, we’ll discuss a recent study that looks at how job comparison can lead to emotional exhaustion, not only for the individual being compared, but also for their partner. We’ll also reflect on the implications of these findings for organisations and employees themselves.

What will I read about in this article?

 

Constantly comparing yourself with others, in and out of the office

The comparison with others is (practically) inevitable. It is as old as we can imagine, and at the same time, it is entirely contemporary. According to some experts, the constant presence of social media in our lives could lead to even greater comparison.

Moreover, the possibilities for social comparison seem endless: from summer resorts to exquisite food, from home furnishings to the number of followers or the number of “likes” on a post.

In the midst of this scenario, work and family are two common areas in which to look at whether others enjoy a better state. The perception that my environment enjoys better jobs or manages to have (apparently) more united, communicative, and joyful families, instead of inspiring us, as many studies point out, sometimes demotivates us.

Some of these studies go so far as to claim that our well-being depends, to some extent, on this subjective comparison with others. Dawn Carlson, professor of management at Baylor University, and her team wanted to go further.

pros y contras de compararse

They set out to understand the effects of a new element of comparison: work-life balance: do others have a more harmonious life than I do? Do they organise themselves better?

 

The effect of job comparisons on couples: an analysis of emotional exhaustion

The Human Relations study looked at how comparisons in workload and work-life balance can cause emotional exhaustion at home and at work. The researchers suggest that a negative evaluation of these comparisons can affect not only the person making the comparison, but also their partner.

Carslon’s team surveyed 403 couples in the United States at two different points in time. All couples were on average 35 years old, had been married for an average of 8 years and worked full-time. They were asked about workload comparison and work-life balance, personality traits, self-efficacy and levels of emotional exhaustion.

 

“Whether the perception of inferiority is true or false, it affects the person with the same intensity”.

 

The study found that people who felt more overburdened than their peers perceived less work-life balance. But they caution that the comparison we make with others is usually subjective.

We don’t have all the information and it tends to be partial. However, it seems that the “quality” of the comparison doesn’t matter much, as the perception of inferiority, whether true or false, affects the person with the same intensity. This reduced their confidence to balance the situation and increased emotional exhaustion at work and at home. The effects also extended to their partners.

 

Reflections on the consequences of comparing oneself to others in the office

The results of this interesting study have important implications for both organisations and employees themselves:

Supervisors need to be aware that employees compare their workload. This comparison, whether well-founded or not, generates important consequences for the families, but also for the organisations themselves, increasing emotional exhaustion. In this way, emotional exhaustion can lead to even more serious consequences such as health problems, lack of productivity, intention to leave the company and absenteeism.

Organisations in general, and supervisors specifically, can work to improve transparency and fairness in the distribution of workloads. Encouraging this balance can reduce the need for constant comparison, and thereby avoid the undesirable effects of comparison with others.

Employees could perhaps try, as far as possible, to focus on “quality” comparisons in order to avoid consequences for work and family that are more serious than they may appear at first sight.

comparar tamaño piñas

A quality comparison with others should take into account at least three aspects: objectivity, specificity and contextualisation. On the one hand, the comparison needs to follow objective criteria (e.g. number of hours, actual salary, years worked). The best remedy to the subjective comparisons that prevail in many cases is objectivity. On the other hand, it’s important to be aware that a quality comparison should be specific and limited to certain concrete aspects and criteria, avoiding excessive and general extrapolations. Finally, it’s essential to contextualise each case, i.e. to understand and consider the context that may explain possible differences. For example, perhaps one person has a better work shift than another because he or she has been with the organisation for many more years and has been on the disputed shift before.

Constant comparison with others at the office has significant consequences: it can reduce work-life balance and increase emotional exhaustion. It’s vital that organisations aim to reduce situations of inequality in teams that can lead colleagues into states of comparison and loss of trust. A healthier perspective on this matter can lead to greater well-being and satisfaction both at work and at home.

 

References: